India Calls for Stronger Global Cooperation on Disaster Risk Reduction, Resilient Infrastructure

India has called for stronger international cooperation, resilient infrastructure and more effective disaster financing to address growing risks posed by climate change, rapid urbanisation and environmental degradation. Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister P K Mishra stressed that countries must prioritise disaster prevention, preparedness and recovery to protect not only human lives but also infrastructure, economic assets and development gains.

NHRC Urges Police Sensitisation to Stop Victim-Shaming of Women, Calls for Patrolling at Crime Hotspots

ECI orders transfer of election-related officers in Goa, UP, 3 other states ahead of 2027 assembly polls The order covers EROs, ADMs, SDMs, tehsildars, block development officers, and divisional and municipal commissioners. Updated on: Oct 27, 2026, 18:20:24 IST By Himanshi Dahiya Prefer HTPrefer HT Prefer HT on Google Share The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Tuesday directed Goa, Manipur, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand to transfer officers associated with election work who are posted in their home districts or have served in the same district for three years or more, ahead of the 2027 Assembly elections. The ECI stated that no officer covered by the directive would be allowed to continue in their present district if they meet the transfer criteria. (HT_PRINT) The ECI stated that no officer covered by the directive would be allowed to continue in their present district if they meet the transfer criteria. (HT_PRINT) In a letter to the chief secretaries and chief electoral officers of the five states, the Commission stated that no officer covered by the directive would be allowed to continue in their present district if they meet the transfer criteria. The cut-off date for calculating the three-year tenure has been set as March 31, 2027, for Goa, Manipur, Punjab and Uttarakhand, and May 31, 2027, for Uttar Pradesh. The Commission clarified that promotions to posts within the same district would be counted while calculating the three-year period. However, services rendered at the state headquarters during the past four years would not be included in the calculation, even if the headquarters falls within the same revenue district. The state governments have also been instructed to ensure that transferred officers are not posted to their home districts. District election officers (DEOs), returning officers (ROs), assistant returning officers (AROs) and other designated officials cannot be posted back to the constituency or district where they served during the previous Assembly election or any by-election held since then. The directive covers a wide range of administrative and election-related officials, including electoral registration officers (EROs), additional district magistrates (ADMs), sub-divisional magistrates (SDMs), tehsildars, block development officers, divisional commissioners and municipal commissioners. In the police department, the order applies to officers from the rank of sub-inspector up to range inspector generals and police commissioners. Excise and transport department officials holding the rank of sub-inspector or above are also covered. The Commission has made a separate provision for personnel involved in the ongoing Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls. Their transfer will take place only after the final publication of the electoral rolls and in consultation with the chief electoral officer. Chief secretaries and directors general of police (DGPs) of the five states have been directed to submit compliance reports to the Commission by November 30. Officers associated with election work will be required to submit a declaration within two days of the last date for filing nominations. The declaration must state that they are not close relatives of any contesting candidate and have no criminal cases pending against them. The terms of the five state Assemblies are due to end between March 13, 2027, in Manipur and May 22, 2027, in Uttar Pradesh. The Election Commission has yet to announce the final schedule for the Assembly elections.

New rules on animal testing must take India forward, not backwards: Maneka Gandhi Officials maintain the changes seek to simplify approvals for research institutions, pharmaceutical and biomedical industries. Updated on: Oct 26, 2026, 14:54:47 IST By Jasjeev Gandhiok Prefer HTPrefer HT Prefer HT on Google Share The Centre’s draft rules governing animal experimentation have triggered concerns among animal rights groups, which say the changes could weaken independent oversight and make it easier for laboratories to conduct experiments on animals. However, officials maintain the changes seek to simplify approvals for research institutions, pharmaceutical and biomedical industries. Former Union minister Maneka Gandhi. Former Union minister Maneka Gandhi. HT speaks to animal rights activist and former Union minister Maneka Gandhi, a long-time campaigner against animal experimentation. Edited excerpts: A major change to animal experimentation, proposed in the draft, is that mild and moderate experiments could be approved by an institution’s own ethics committee rather than going to the central regulator. In practical terms, what does this change mean for an animal inside a laboratory? Does it make it easier for more animals to be experimented on? It means the animal loses the one independent pair of eyes that was looking at its fate. Today, experiments on animals larger than a rat go to the central regulator, and there is at least someone outside the building asking whether this experiment is necessary at all. Under the draft, the people who want to do the experiment, their colleagues and their department heads will be the ones approving it. And it is the institution itself, through its own veterinarian, that decides whether the experiment is mild or moderate in the first place. No institution has ever turned down its own funding. So yes, it will make it easier, and it will make it faster, and that means more animals. Mild and moderate are also the bulk of experiments, so we are effectively handing over most of animal experimentation in India to self regulation. The draft classifies experiments as mild, moderate, severe and non-recovery. Is there a concern that the institution conducting the research will effectively decide how severe the experiment is. Does this leave a grey area? It isn’t grey, it is completely black. Under this draft, the institution that wants to do the experiment is also the one that decides which category it falls into. That decision matters enormously, because if the experiment is classified as mild or moderate, the institution’s own committee approves it and it never goes to the central regulator. Only severe and non-recovery experiments on larger animals go outside. So the same people who want the experiment approved are deciding whether anyone independent will ever examine it. That is a clear conflict of interest, and it will push experiments towards the lower categories. Starving a rat for a day is called mild. Keeping a social animal alone in a cage is mild. Starving it for two days, or putting it through distress it cannot escape, is moderate. So is testing herbal products, testing established drugs, and anything described as having “known and reversible effects,” which could mean almost anything. This is not a scientific list. It is the most common commercial work. The draft also creates exceptions and allows laboratories to use animals from open markets, unregistered sources, and in certain circumstances, stray, feral, wild and protected animals. What is the biggest risk that this may create for animals in practice? Could community dogs, lost pets or animals taken from the wild find their way into laboratories? The biggest risk is that nobody will know where an animal came from. The whole point of registered breeders was traceability. Once you allow open markets and unregistered sources for cattle, goats, birds and fish, you create a demand, and in this country demand is met very quickly by people who will pick up anything. Strays and wild animals can be used if a “competent authority” permits it, and the draft never says who that is. Community dogs, someone’s lost pet, birds from illegal markets, all of it can find its way into a laboratory. These exceptions should be removed completely. If a lab cannot get an animal from a registered source, it should not be doing that experiment. The draft formally incorporates the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement, but critics say these safeguards become weaker if institutions themselves are approving experiments. Do you believe India should now be moving towards replacing animal experiments altogether, particularly when the health ministry has already allowed certain drug testing through non-animal methods? What should the rules do differently? Yes, and we are not starting from zero. The health ministry has already amended the drug rules to accept non-animal methods. The world is moving this way because these methods are often more predictive for humans than a mouse ever was. Writing replacement, reduction and refinement into the rules means nothing if the person checking compliance is the institution itself. The rules should make it mandatory to show that no validated alternative exists before an animal is used, set up a national body to validate and promote alternatives, put money into them, and set timelines to phase out animal use in areas where alternatives are already available. A rule that only mentions replacement as a principle is decoration. You have worked on animal experimentation regulation for decades. What specific changes would you want the government to make to this draft? I don’t think this draft can be fixed. There is hardly a provision in it that doesn’t need changing, and when everything needs to change, it is better to start again. So the draft should be put aside and written afresh, this time with independent scientists, animal welfare organisations and legal experts at the table. The new rules must take India forward, not backwards. Animals already have certain protections under the law which cannot be taken away. New should be building on them.

Addressing the Meeting of Senior Officials on Disaster Risk Reduction, convened by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and co-chaired by India and the United Kingdom, Mishra highlighted the increasingly interconnected nature of disaster risks. He noted that climate change, expanding urban centres, infrastructure development and environmental degradation were creating complex challenges that required coordinated responses across sectors and institutions.

While improvements in early warning systems, disaster preparedness and emergency response have helped save lives, economic losses caused by disasters remain significant. Mishra called for a comprehensive approach that moves beyond departmental silos and accounts for the cascading effects of interconnected risks.

He emphasised the need to accelerate implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction through 2030, with greater attention to prevention, mitigation and institutional capacity. The framework provides an international roadmap for reducing disaster risks and limiting their impact on communities, economies and infrastructure.

Highlighting India’s initiatives under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Mishra referred to the Ten-Point Agenda on Disaster Risk Reduction introduced in 2016 and amendments to the Disaster Management Act in 2025. These efforts reflect India’s focus on strengthening disaster management systems and integrating risk reduction into development planning.

AI and early warning systems in focus

Mishra underscored the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and multi-hazard early warning systems in improving disaster preparedness. He stressed that technological advancements must translate into timely action on the ground to minimise casualties and economic damage.

According to his remarks, early warnings must be supported by effective response mechanisms and adequate financing. Without timely action and resources, even advanced warning systems may not deliver their full potential in protecting vulnerable communities.

He also called for resilient infrastructure, stronger urban institutions and the integration of nature-based solutions into development strategies. Such measures, he emphasised, are essential to reduce exposure to disasters and ensure that development does not create additional vulnerabilities.

On disaster financing, Mishra advocated an outcome-based approach in which investments deliver measurable improvements in resilience. He stressed that governments and institutions must ensure public resources are used effectively to strengthen preparedness, reduce risks and limit long-term economic losses.

Mishra further highlighted the importance of planning recovery and reconstruction mechanisms in advance. He said rebuilding efforts after disasters should address existing vulnerabilities rather than reproduce the conditions that made communities susceptible to damage in the first place.

India pushes international collaboration

Reaffirming India’s commitment to global cooperation, Mishra highlighted the establishment of the G20 Working Group on Disaster Risk Reduction during India’s G20 Presidency in 2023. He also pointed to continued efforts to strengthen international collaboration during India’s BRICS chairship.

He outlined three key priorities for the global community: improving the understanding of emerging and interconnected disaster risks; making more effective investments in resilience across public finance, infrastructure, cities and natural systems; and strengthening institutions through practical international cooperation.

Mishra called for countries to consolidate the progress achieved under the Sendai Framework and accelerate its implementation before 2030. He emphasised that disaster risk reduction must become an integral part of development planning rather than remain limited to emergency response.

Looking ahead, Mishra said the coming decade would be critical in demonstrating whether countries could safeguard the lives, assets, infrastructure and development achievements of their communities. India’s call for stronger international partnerships underscores the need for coordinated action, sustainable investment and effective institutions to address the growing challenges of disaster risk.

NHRC Urges Police Sensitisation to Stop Victim-Shaming of Women, Calls for Patrolling at Crime Hotspots