‘We are Hurt… Why is CM Silent?’: Tejashwi Yadav Reacts to Patna High Court Order Rejecting 65% Quota

Tejashwi Yadav, leader of the opposition in Bihar, has expressed dismay over the Patna High Court’s decision to reject the state government’s proposal for a 65% reservation quota, calling into question Chief Minister [CM’s Name]’s silence on the matter.

The court’s ruling, which deemed the proposed quota excessive and in violation of constitutional provisions, has sparked a political firestorm in Bihar. Tejashwi Yadav, speaking on behalf of the opposition, criticized the state leadership for not adequately defending the reservation policy in court.

“We are deeply hurt by the court’s decision. The 65% quota was a measure aimed at ensuring social justice and equality,” Yadav stated during a press briefing, emphasizing the importance of reservations in addressing historical injustices and empowering marginalized communities.

Yadav’s remarks underscored broader concerns about the impact of the court’s decision on Bihar’s social fabric and the state government’s responsibility to safeguard the rights of disadvantaged groups. He questioned Chief Minister [CM’s Name]’s perceived silence on the issue, urging transparency and accountability in governance.

In response to the court’s verdict, supporters of the reservation policy have voiced their disappointment, highlighting its potential implications for education and employment opportunities in Bihar. The decision has reignited debates on the balance between merit-based selection and affirmative action measures.

Political analysts suggest that the Patna High Court’s ruling could influence electoral dynamics and public sentiment ahead of upcoming state elections, with parties expected to align their platforms on issues of social justice and inclusive development.

As Bihar grapples with the aftermath of the court’s decision, stakeholders await further legal and political developments that could shape the future of reservation policies in the state.