In the wake of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent remark about delivering a “tight slap” to opposition parties, the Congress Party has swiftly drawn attention to a reminder of respectful conduct in public discourse: the Supreme Court’s rebuke directed at them for a similar choice of words.
During a recent political rally, Prime Minister Modi stirred controversy when he rhetorically spoke about delivering a “tight slap” to opposition parties for their alleged misinformation campaign against his government. The remark has sparked a flurry of reactions across the political spectrum, with many criticizing the language used by the Prime Minister.
Responding to Modi’s statement, the Congress Party invoked a significant episode from the past, reminding of the Supreme Court’s strong criticism against them for using the term “chowkidar chor hai” (the watchman is a thief) in reference to Prime Minister Modi in the context of the Rafale deal controversy. The apex court had expressed its disapproval, emphasizing the need for dignified discourse in political debates.
Congress spokespersons reiterated the importance of maintaining decorum and respect in political discourse, especially coming from the highest office in the country. They emphasized that while political disagreements are inevitable in a democracy, resorting to language that incites violence or disrespect undermines the very essence of democratic values.
The exchange highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the language and rhetoric employed by political leaders in India. It underscores the responsibility of elected officials to uphold the dignity of public office and set a positive example for the nation.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, discussions around language, respect, and decorum in political discourse remain pertinent. Both ruling and opposition parties are reminded of the importance of engaging in constructive dialogue while maintaining civility and respect for differing viewpoints.