India
A tense exchange unfolded at a university event in London where the Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, speaking on artificial intelligence and international law, faced an unexpected interruption from attendees raising concerns about alleged suppression of dissent in India.
The lecture, held at Birkbeck College, University of London, focused on “Artificial Intelligence and International Law.” However, the session took a sharp turn during the interactive segment when an attendee attempted to raise a question linking India’s democratic track record with judicial and constitutional concerns.
According to video clips circulating on social media, the attendee began by acknowledging the Chief Justice’s remarks on democracy and AI, before stating that several legal observers within India and abroad have expressed concerns over what they described as increasing hostility toward dissent. Before the question could be fully articulated, the moderator intervened, stating that the question was outside the scope of the lecture and could not be taken.
The moderator can be heard repeatedly apologising while insisting the discussion must remain limited to artificial intelligence and international law. The decision led to visible disagreement among some attendees, with another participant heard objecting and demanding that the audience be allowed to speak freely.
The incident was later amplified online after clips were reshared by members linked to the online political movement Cockroach Janta Party, including its chief spokesperson Saurav Das. The group, which has recently announced a protest in Delhi over exam-related controversies, has previously referenced remarks made by the Chief Justice in public discourse.
The controversy also gained traction due to the broader political context in which it was interpreted by commentators, drawing parallels with other international events where visiting Indian officials have faced questions on press freedom and dissent.
During his lecture, Chief Justice Surya Kant emphasised that artificial intelligence presents one of the most significant challenges for modern international law. He stated that technology itself is neutral, but its impact depends on the legal and ethical frameworks societies build around it. He further stressed that the responsibility of law is to ensure that technological power remains aligned with constitutional values, democratic legitimacy, and human dignity.
He also highlighted the risk of accountability being weakened in systems where decision-making is increasingly driven by algorithms. According to him, if responsibility becomes fragmented, legal accountability may become difficult to define, posing a major challenge for democratic governance in the digital age.
The Chief Justice is currently on a six-day visit to the United Kingdom, during which he has participated in academic discussions and institutional engagements focused on law, technology, and global governance.
The episode has since sparked debate online over the boundaries of academic forums, freedom of speech, and the handling of politically sensitive questions in structured institutional events.
English
Gujarati
Hindi
Kannada
Malayalam
Marathi
Punjabi
Tamil
Telugu
