YouTuber and comedian Samay Raina appeared before the Maharashtra Cyber Cell on Friday for questioning in connection with a case registered against him and several others over a controversial episode of his YouTube show, India’s Got Latent. The FIR was lodged following widespread criticism of offensive remarks made during the episode.
The Maharashtra cyber police have reportedly summoned over 30 individuals for questioning as part of their investigation. Previously, content creators Ranveer Allahbadia, Ashish Chanchlani, and Apoorva Mukhija, among others, were also called in to record their statements regarding the incident.
Background of the Controversy
The controversy erupted in February when an episode of India’s Got Latent featured influencer Ranveer Allahbadia making a highly inappropriate remark directed at a contestant. The episode, which also included participation from Ashish Chanchlani, Apoorva Mukhija (known as “The Rebel Kid”), and Samay Raina, quickly drew backlash for its explicit content.
Following the outrage, an FIR was filed citing charges of promoting obscenity and engaging in sexually explicit discussions. The show has since been deleted from YouTube.
What Did Ranveer Allahbadia Say?
During the episode, Ranveer posed an unsettling question to a contestant:
“Would you rather watch your parents have sex every day or join them to finish it once and for all?”
His fellow panelists appeared shocked by the remark. Samay Raina immediately reacted, exclaiming, “What the f**?”* while another participant questioned, “Kya ho gaya hai Ranveer bhai ko?” (What has happened to Ranveer?).
The remark sparked widespread criticism, leading Allahbadia to issue a public apology. In a video statement, he acknowledged that his comment was inappropriate and not intended to be humorous. “Comedy is not my forte. Just here to say sorry,” he stated.
Legal Repercussions and Supreme Court Remarks
The Supreme Court also weighed in on the controversy during a recent hearing. Without directly naming Raina, Justice Kant criticized the comedian for discussing the case during a show in Canada. The judge remarked that some young influencers underestimate the legal jurisdiction of Indian courts.
“These youngsters think we are an outdated generation. One of them has gone to Canada and spoken there. They don’t understand the jurisdiction this Court enjoys. We don’t want to take action because they are young; we understand,” Justice Kant commented.
Investigation Continues
The Maharashtra Cyber Cell is continuing its probe, and more individuals associated with the show are expected to be questioned. This case has reignited the debate on responsible content creation and the legal implications of digital media in India.
As authorities push forward with their investigation, the case serves as a cautionary tale for digital creators regarding the limits of humor and the responsibilities that come with a vast online audience.